Resources
Introduction
The perinatal period is a critical window in the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) paradigm, where early-life exposures can have profound and lasting impacts on an individual’s health trajectory. Conducting research in this field demands rigorous adherence to best practices to ensure the validity, reproducibility, and ethical integrity of findings. Moreover, demonstrating experimental rigor and translatability is essential for building public trust and informing policymakers, thereby enhancing the impact of research on health policies and interventions for service populations.
A successful DOHaD perinatal research cycle involves careful experimental design, meticulous execution, transparent reporting, and ethical considerations for both animal and human studies. By adhering to established guidelines and standards, researchers can assure stakeholders that their studies are conducted with the highest level of scientific excellence. This not only bolsters confidence among the public and policymakers but also ensures that research findings are applicable and beneficial to the communities they aim to serve.
The following resources are essential guides that offer comprehensive support throughout this research journey. They help scientists contribute valuable insights to the DOHaD community while upholding rigorous standards that enhance the credibility and translatability of their work.
Land and Acknowledgement Resources
Description: A land acknowledgment in DOHaD (Developmental Origins of Health and Disease) research recognizes and respects the Indigenous peoples who have historically stewarded the lands where research is conducted. This practice honors their knowledge and contributions to understanding health, environment, and well-being, fostering an ethical, inclusive research approach that values diverse perspectives and addresses health disparities rooted in historical injustices.
Links:
https://native-land.ca/ (A good resource for research as well as to determine which lands you are on)
https://nativegov.org/news/a-guide-to-indigenous-land-acknowledgment/
Rigor and Reproducibility – National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Extramural Research
Description: The NIH provides guidelines and training modules to enhance rigor and reproducibility in biomedical research. These resources cover experimental design, blinding, randomization, and statistical considerations.
Statistical Reporting
Description: Using best practices in statistical reporting is essential in biomedical and human cohort studies to ensure that findings are transparent, reproducible, and scientifically valid. Clear, standardized reporting of statistical methods allows other researchers to accurately interpret and replicate the study, which is critical for verifying results and advancing scientific knowledge. It also helps readers assess the robustness of the findings, recognize potential biases, and understand the statistical limitations, ultimately supporting evidence-based decision-making in healthcare and policy.
STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology): This guideline is widely used for reporting observational studies, such as cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. It includes recommendations on presenting statistical methods, confounder adjustments, and how results should be reported. STROBE Statement
CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials): Primarily for randomized controlled trials, CONSORT also offers valuable guidance for reporting statistical analysis details, including subgroup analysis, handling missing data, and sample size calculation. CONSORT Statement
SAMPL (Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature): SAMPL is a set of guidelines designed to help authors in the biomedical sciences report statistical analyses clearly. It covers various statistical practices, including hypothesis testing, confidence intervals, and regression analysis. SAMPL
ICMJE Recommendations: The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) provides recommendations on reporting statistical methods to ensure transparency and reproducibility, covering aspects like data integrity, analysis transparency, and appropriate statistical methods. The ICMJE Recommendations
ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments): For studies involving animal models, ARRIVE provides guidelines that also include best practices for reporting statistical methods in preclinical research. ARRIVE Guidelines
ARRIVE Guidelines 2.0 (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments)
Description: The ARRIVE guidelines offer a comprehensive checklist for reporting animal research. They aim to improve the transparency, reproducibility, and ethical standards of animal studies by providing guidance on experimental design, statistical analysis, and detailed reporting.
Link: ARRIVE Guidelines
CONSORT Statement (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials)
Description: The CONSORT Statement is a set of recommendations for reporting randomized controlled trials involving human participants. It includes a 25-item checklist and flow diagram to ensure clarity and transparency in reporting, which facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation.
Link: CONSORT Statement
STROBE Guidelines (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology)
Description: STROBE provides guidance on reporting observational studies, including cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. These guidelines help researchers present their findings transparently, making it easier for others to assess the study’s validity.
Link: STROBE Statement
NC3Rs Experimental Design Assistant (EDA)
Description: The EDA is a free online tool that helps researchers design robust and reproducible experiments involving animals. It provides support on minimizing bias, determining sample size, and planning statistical analyses.
Link: NC3Rs EDA
Equator Network (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research)
Description: The Equator Network is an international initiative that provides a comprehensive list of reporting guidelines for health research. It assists researchers in selecting appropriate guidelines to improve the quality and transparency of their publications.
Link: Equator Network
SPIRIT Statement (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials)
Description: SPIRIT provides guidelines for drafting clinical trial protocols, ensuring that all essential elements are included. This is particularly useful for planning human intervention studies in DOHaD research.
Link: SPIRIT Statement
Data Sharing and Management (Biomedical) Research
Description: These guides discuss best practices for data management and sharing, highlighting common pitfalls and solutions. Proper data management is essential for transparency and reproducibility in DOHaD studies.
PRISMA Statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)
Description: PRISMA offers guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. These tools are valuable for DOHaD researchers synthesizing existing literature.
Link: PRISMA Statement
Equity in DOHaD – Resources and Tools
Description:The following is a list of resources, tools, organizations that may be of interest to the DOHaD community. If there are links that you believe may be helpful to our network, please include them.
Links:
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to Action (FR: Commission de vérité et réconciliation du Canada : Appels à l’action)
Learning resources about First Nations, Inuit and Métis across Canada
We can also include relevant Petition links (see below some examples)
Sign the petition calling for a National Day of Mourning (FR: https://www.change.org/p/justin-trudeau-appel-au-jour-de-deuil-national-pour-les-enfants-disparus-dans-les-pensionnats-autochtones)
Authorship
Description: Establishing best practices for determining authorship in scientific papers is essential for ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness among contributors. Clear authorship guidelines help recognize individual contributions accurately, prevent disputes, and uphold ethical standards. This fosters a collaborative research environment where credit is appropriately assigned, maintaining trust and integrity within the scientific community.
Links:
By utilizing these resources, researchers can enhance the quality, ethical standards, and impact of their studies in the DOHaD field. Remember to check for the most recent updates or editions of these resources to stay current with evolving best practices.